Apple will make it simpler to builders to port iPhone and iPad apps to the Mac, however that doesn’t imply a touchscreen Mac is popping out.
Craig Federighi, speaking to Wired, stated he’s “not into touchscreens” on PCs, after which went on:
We actually really feel that the ergonomics of utilizing a Mac are that your arms are rested on a floor, and that lifting your arm as much as poke a display screen is a reasonably fatiguing factor to do. I donât suppose weâve checked out any of the opposite guys up to now and stated, how briskly can we get there?
This is smart to me. I’ve tried a number of Home windows computer systems that featured a touchscreen, and I’ll admit that it was often good to have—particularly whereas scrolling. However there have been additionally small annoyances. Most UI components are too small to precisely contact whereas in desktop mode, and switching to pill mode isn’t fairly as fluid correctly. And even the necessity for 2 separate “modes” is fairly complicated.
It’s a compromise. A compromise that provides some cool options, positive, however one which drains the battery, makes the display screen thicker, and leaves the consumer expertise child of messy. In different phrases, precisely the form of compromise Apple doesn’t wish to make.
Apple might change course on this—it wouldn’t be the primary time they stated one thing isn’t occurring a number of occasions just for it to occur. However I don’t suppose we’ll see a touchscreen Mac anytime quickly (except you rely the Contact Bar, which you actually shouldn’t.)